NYT and AP at Odds (For Now) on Whether Obama Admin Is ‘Nearing a Diplomatic Breakthrough’ With Iran

Posted: October 21, 2012 by AKA John Galt in 2012, Terrorism, World Topics
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Seventeen days before Election Day and 45 months after Barack Obama’s inauguration following a presidential campaign during which he expressed his eagerness to meet enemy leaders “without preconditions” (Obama responded “yes” to a 2008 presidential debate question containing those words), the New York Times is reporting that the U.S. and Iran “have agreed in principle for the first time to one-on-one negotiations,” despite the fact that the White House has “denied that a final agreement (to negotiate) had been reached,” and despite a reactive AP report (saved here for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes) claiming that while “The White House says it is prepared to talk one-on-one … there’s no agreement now to meet.”

Despite the supposed certainty of the Times’s headline (“U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks”), the paper’s Helene Cooper and Mark Landler report that “American officials said they were uncertain whether Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had signed off on the effort.” If Khamenei isn’t on board, it doesn’t matter what anybody else, including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, says or does. Three years ago, two AP reporters covering the government’s crackdown on dissidents noted Khamenei’s “virtually limitless authority,” i.e., he’s the country’s behind-the-scenes dictator. In a piece that’s supposed to be about a supposedly important international development, Cooper and Landler predictably blow through quite a bit of ink and bandwidth trying to paint this development as a problem for Obama’s GOP opponent Mitt Romney (bolds are mine):

Read more here.

About these ads
Comments
  1. rangerrebew says:

    How ironic that with the election so close, the administration has found a way for Obama to talk with them and do the same fine job of negotiating he did to get the olympics in Chicago. One on one, Eichmanidinijad will eat him alive.

  2. Tom says:

    So great that the only two candidates they can come up with are these two clowns,a commie and a commie.
    Fits inwiththe UN agenda 21,and the international small agreement.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s