Obama and Holder taking on Arizona’s SB1070: Patriot Network TV

Posted: August 14, 2010 by AKA John Galt in Immigration
Tags: , , ,
About these ads
Comments
  1. H. E. Meyer says:

    I think Obama & Holder are making a very big mistake.
    Also keep an eye on those muslim mosque that are building in Europe and the US.
    Looks like to me they going to try and take over our United States.
    Their nothing but ragheaded Muslims that think their way is the only way. Thats not going to happen here as far as i am concerned.

    • USMC back in the day 1968 says:

      Obama & Holder and supporters by signing their name to a law suite against Arizona State with a foreign country (Mexico) in it’s self is giving aid to a foreign country with intent on assaulting the United States boarders.
      That is called treason.

  2. The Legacy of 1776 says:

    MEXICO IS ANGRY!
    Three cheers for Arizona!
    The shoe is on the other foot and Mexicans from the State of Sonora, and Mexico don’t like it.
    The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico. Nine state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona’s new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico.
    It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona’s new Employer Sanctions Law will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state.
    At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora ― Arizona’s southern neighbor, made up of mostly small towns–cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money. The Arizona law punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States. Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business licenses.

    The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government.
    “How can Arizona pass a law like this?” asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales.
    “There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona,” she said, speaking in Spanish.
    “Mexico is not prepared for this ― for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families, return to their home-towns in Sonora without jobs,” she said. “We are one family, socially and economically,” she said, referring to the people of Sonora and Arizona. Wrong!

    The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico, and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico’s citizens.
    New Immigration Laws: Read to the bottom or you will miss the message.
    1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
    2. All ballots will be in this nation’s language.
    3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
    4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
    5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
    6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
    7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
    8. If foreigners come here and buy land… options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
    9. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
    10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted and, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.

    Too strict?

    The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO!

  3. George says:

    Okay…okay…OKAY! ALL GREAT POINTS. ALL EXPERTLY CONVEYED. BUT….WHY……………WHY……………..WHY, BASED ON THE MAIN POINT YOU DISCUSS…WHY DON’T WE TAKE ACTION TO IMPREACH THIS PRESIDENT…….NOW!

    EVERYONE TALKS AND POINTS OUT THINGS THAT HE IS DOING THAT ARE UNPRECEDENTED, WITH MUCH OF WHAT HE HAS DONE CONSTRUED AS ILLEGAL. BUT I HAVE HEARD NOTHING ON IMPEACHING THE MAN. IF ANYONE IN AMERICAN HISTORY DESERVES THE BOOT… THIS GUY DOES.

    IS IT THAT WE’D ALL BE CALLED RACISTS IF WE DID, NOT THAT WE ARE OR WOULD EVER STOOP TO THAT LOW LEVEL OF EXISTENCE, BUT THAT OTHERS MAY VIEW US AS SUCH, REGARDLESS?

    IS IT THAT EVERYONE IS AFRAID TO STAND UP AGAINST HIM AND RAISE THE IMPEACHMENT ISSUE, CALLING FOR HIS IMMEDIATE REMOVAL?

    IS IT THAT WE’D ALL BE AFRAID OF WHAT THE BIDEN COULD FOUL UP IF OBAMA WAS EJECTED. WAS THAT OBAMA’S ORIGINAL PLAN, TO PUT A BUMBLING FUMBLER IN AS HIS REPLACEMENT, SO THAT AMERICAN’S WILL STAY WITH THE STATUS QUO, NO MATTER HOW CORRUPT IT GETS?

    IS IT SIMPLY THE LENGTH OF TIME IT WOULD TAKE TO BOOT HIM OUT; THAT THE GENERAL ELECTION WILL BE HERE SOONER THAN THE TIME IT WOULD TAKE TO OUST HIM?

    IS IT THAT HE WOULD NO DOUBT SEND BIDEN PACKING AND PUT CLINTON IN AS VP, IF ‘IMPEACHMENT’ WAS HEARD IN THE WIND? AND, WITH THAT, AN UNBROKEN CONTINUOUS SUCCESSION OF PROGRESSIVES IN POWER.

    IS THERE NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM FOR SOMEONE TO PERSUE IMPEACHEMENT PROCEEDINGS?

    WHAT IS IT? WHAT MAKES US AFRAID OF THIS MAN? WE GO TO RALLIES AND RAISE OUR FLAGS WHILE HE FLAUNTS HIS RADICAL IDEOLOGY AND CAUSES HAVOC ON OUR NATION.

    WHO ARE WE? ARE WE SO TIMID OF ‘ENGAGEMENT’ WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT, THAT WE COWER IN FEAR. IS THAT WHAT TODAY’S AMERICAN’S ARE MADE OF. I THINK NOT, BUT WHERE ARE OUR ELECTED LEADERS TO LISTEN AND TAKE ACTION? ARE WE SO POLITICALLY CORRECT THAT OUR WE SUFFER DILUTED COURAGE?

    WHO WILL STAND UP? WHO IN CONGRESS, PRESSED BY THE PEOPLE, WOULD TAKE A STAND AGAINST THIS PRESIDENT AND TO CALL FOR HIS REMOVAL? IS THAT A NAIVE’ NOTION? IS IT NAIVE’ TO STAND BY AND WATCH OUR OWN CITIZENS BE SLAUGHTERED BY INVADERS FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY. DO MOST AMERICANS REALLY JUST WANT ALL THIS TO GO AWAY AND LET SOMEONE ELSE HANDLE IT, EVEN WHEN THE FIGHT IS LOOMING AT OUR BACK DOOR?

    THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS HERE, AND I FEAR TOO FEW ANSWERS.

    • elaine says:

      Not afraid one iota….just not able to find a legitimate organized group to join for his impeachment. Sometimes we are way too civilized…that’s my feeling. He (Obama) is obviously ruining this country. I am very angry over all that he has done and is trying to do.

  4. Miles says:

    Has anyone started impeachment yet?, if not, WHY?
    Obama is a traitor to the American people. He must be stopped,
    or is it to late to save this country and our freedoms.

  5. Bob says:

    If all else fails, Arizona has a constitutional right to secede from the union. I’m sure many states would follow you, as Texas and New Mexico comes to mind. Texas was a Republic before joining statehood. The only Republic to engage in war with Mexico. These 3 states are rich in commerce, oil and tourism.

  6. Henry says:

    Americans have been in Lalaland for the past sixty-five years, and now they are shocked because the President and the entire US Congress are ignoring them. Americans just don’t know that the US Federal Government is suing the State of Arizona in accordance to Article 103 of the United Nations, which supersedes the supremacy clause or Article III – Section II of the U.S. Constitution since the US joined the UN as one of the five permanent member nations in 1945.

    The United Nations Treaties are the supreme law of the land. Article 103 of the U.N. Charter makes it clear that its Charter supersedes all other conflicting treaties.
    The U.N. Article 103 reads as follow: “In the event of conflict between the obligations of the Member States of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.”

    In a speech to the American Bar Association’s regional meeting at Louisville, Kentucky on April 11, 1952, John Foster Dulles said, “Treaties make international law and they also make domestic law. Under our Constitution, treaties become the Supreme Law of the Land. They are indeed more supreme than ordinary laws, for Congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution, whereas treaty laws can override the Constitution.” Dulles said the power to make treaties “is an extraordinary power liable to abuse.

    Former American Bar Assoc. President, 1946- 1947, Carl B. Rix, in Senate testimony on May 11, 1955 summarized the destruction of our Constitution thusly: Congress is no longer bound by its Constitutional system of delegated power. Its only test is under the obligatory power to promote human rights (not the inalienable rights secured for us by our Constitution) in these fields of endeavor. Civil, political, economic, social and cultural, these powers are found in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations. Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution.

    • R Stoddard says:

      Should we be surprised that the UN promotes Communism and is the enemy of the USA? Just remember that our our delegate to the charter formation of the UN in San Francisco was a Communist Russian Spy! named Alger Hiss. Hiss made Richard Nixon famous when Nixon exposed this fact. Nothing has been done to change the fact that Alger Hiss, a Communist Russian Spy represented the United States in the formation of the United Nations charter. Check it out!

  7. Henry says:

    Professor Lovell, by refusing to publish my comments you will not be able to change the reality that you are either plain naïve or you are in complete denial of the fact that America today is a Fascist State under the Oppressive Dictatorial Control of the International Bankers of the Federal Reserve System, assisted by the Three Branches of Government, the Leaders of the Corporate World, and Organized Religion, which in reality are the offspring of the Money Changers that Jesus cleared out of the Temple Courts in Jerusalem over two thousand years ago. They walk in the footsteps of their forefather Cain lusting for power and control. Unlike Jesus Christ they prostrate to the devil in worship, gaining in return untold riches and authority over the kingdom of darkness by which they exercise full supremacy, hiding behind the IRS 501c3 Tax-Exempt Code. http://t.co/RoQy4dQ

  8. YouForgetWhenConvenient says:

    I find it rather disturbing that all the US issues that started with the GW Bush administartion are now seemingly initiated by the Obama administration. Who started the bailouts, exposing CIA operatives, lessening personal privacy and starting wars seems to be forgotten. What happened to the two officers in Texas that went after a drug smuggler? and then ended up in prison? Why was the inaction of the Bush administration on this issue not considered a reason for impeachment?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s