Romney’s Path Is Clear?

Later today, Jon Huntsman is planning on getting out of a race he never had any chance of winning. The man, after all, happily served as Obama’s Ambassador to China. He wrote letters praising the Illustrious One. I was happy to have Huntsman in the race to pull votes away from the other Progressive running, Mitt Romney. Now there is not much blocking Romney from the inevitable. The Establishment wanted their man and they will have him. And America will have Obama for another four years. No one will choose Obama-lite over the real deal after all. Why take RomneyCare when you can have ObamaCare?

National Journal reports:

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman will announce on Monday that he is dropping his bid for the Republican presidential nomination after a disappointing finish in last week’s New Hampshire primary, a source confirmed to National Journal.

Huntsman will endorse Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, squashing any potential rumors that he will seek to run as an independent candidate.

The endorsement will take place at 11 a.m. EST at the Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce in Myrtle Beach, S.C., where Huntsman had previously scheduled several campaign events on Monday.

Some maintain this won’t help Romney because Huntsman was atrracting Democrats. They are wrong as is evident from the voting in New Hampshire. Romney did not sweep the place like expected with Huntsman in the race. Romney was not expected to do as well in South Carolina with his previous fourth place finish in 2008 there. But with Huntsman out and Newt, Santorum and Perry splitting the conservative vote and Paulbots doing their thing, South Carolina should be smooth sailing for Romney. With a win in South Carolina catapulting him to Florida where he is polling well and the winner takes all the delegates…Romney’s path is clear. Senator Grahamnesty and Representative Scott have said that the race should be over if Romney wins their state. Screw the other 47 states then?

Read more here.

Tea Party vs. Occupiers

The Mainstream Media and others have been trying to compare these Occupiers of Wall Street and various cities to the Tea Party and citing that they are similar in expressing dissatisfaction. Nothing could be further from the truth and the names of each movement prove that point to be true. Lefties are usually the ones accusing America and the military of occupying countries and they accuse Israel of occupying the Palestinians. And yet, they have gladly seized upon that term to describe themselves. They shout, “This is what Democracy looks like!” They did this both in the union astroturf protests in Wisconsin and they are yelling this at the current protests. These dimwits have no idea what system of government they even live under. Under democracy, the poor and downtrodden would be in truly dire straights.

And anyone who thinks these movements are the same need to watch the following video and see what happens when tea partiers join the protests and the vitriol thrown at the truly disenchanted people who are working to take back this country for all Americans. The Tea Party believes in individual responsibility and accomplishment. If you turn to the government for your living, then they will live your life for you. And these protesters who apparently have no idea what they stand for, will continue chanting inane ideas and playing Alinsky’s and the government’s useful idiots.

Read more here.

What Is Agenda 21?

Most of my energy has been focused on domestic issues in our fight to restore our country back to its original values. I have heard Agenda 21 mentioned in many forums including Facebook and Twitter, but I have not paid much attention to what this nefarious plan means to the future of America. To be frank, many of the people who I hear mentioning Agenda 21 follow up comments with references to the Bilderbergs, CFR and Illuminati, which automatically turns me off. But as I peel back the layers of this onion, I find that this plan is anything but a conspiracy.

Agenda 21 made its public debut in Rio back in 1992 at The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) or the Earth Summit and more than 178 nations adopted the plan including the United States. Agenda 21 states that it ”is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which humans impact on the environment.” To further secure the implementation of UNCED, the United Nations developed the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) in December 1992. The use of the word sustainable should send chills down your spine when you think about the fact that Obama has chosen Eugenicists as members of his cabinet and that much of the world, particularly the Communist Chinese, believe that the earth is becoming overpopulated. CSD was ”to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels.” The goals of Agenda 21 were reaffirmed in Johannesburg in 2002.

Barack Obama declares on a regular basis that everyone needs to be on “fair” footing, that everyone needs to have shared sacrifice and that we need to bring about shared prosperity and spread the wealth. This ideology is a core goal of Agenda 21. This section of the document details combating poverty and states:

3.1. Poverty is a complex multidimensional problem with origins in both the national and international domains. No uniform solution can be found for global application. Rather, country-specific programmes to tackle poverty and international efforts supporting national efforts, as well as the parallel process of creating a supportive international environment, are crucial for a solution to this problem. The eradication of poverty and hunger, greater equity in income distribution and human resource development remain major challenges everywhere. The struggle against poverty is the shared responsibility of all countries.

It would be easy to relegate Agenda 21 to a powerless United Nations’ resolution. Easy, if not for the fact that Agenda 21 has slowly been implemented right here in America and right here in the state of Florida where I live. The United States signed onto Agenda 21, but it was never ratified by Congress. One reason why I abhor Executive Orders is that it gives the President power never intended by the Constitution. It allows the President to subvert Congress and erases checks and balances. President Bill Clinton went forward with the plans first laid out by President George H. Bush by signing Executive Order 12852 in 1993, The President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD).

Read more here.

%d bloggers like this: